Paste your program description below, or upload a file. We'll run EvalSmart and email you both reports — a comprehensive plan and a concise executive brief, as reviewable drafts.
Review-ready drafts, emailed back to you
Not sure what to write? See a full example program description
Internal Medicine Core Clerkship — Program Description for Evaluation Planning
(Illustrative example. Not based on any specific institution's curriculum.)
Overview
The Internal Medicine Core Clerkship is a required eight-week rotation for third-year medical students in our undergraduate medical education (UME) program. It is a competency-based clerkship: the experience is organized around developing and demonstrating clinical competence, not simply logging time. Students rotate across several teaching sites, including our main academic hospital and a number of community hospitals and ambulatory clinics.
Who it's for
Third-year medical students completing their core clinical year. A typical cohort moves through the rotation in blocks across the academic year.
What students do
Daily inpatient ward rounds, ambulatory clinic sessions, structured oral case presentations, a weekly clinical-reasoning conference, simulation-based skills sessions, written patient encounter write-ups, a formative mid-clerkship feedback meeting, and a summative assessment period.
What the clerkship is trying to develop
Four areas of competence: clinical reasoning, patient care, medical knowledge, and communication.
How students are assessed
NBME shelf exam; end-of-rotation clinical evaluations by faculty and residents; an OSCE with standardized patients; direct-observation assessments; and LMS patient logs. Attendings and residents both teach and rate the students.
Why we want to evaluate the clerkship
Each year the clerkship goes through a CQI review feeding the UME curriculum committee. Leadership's concerns this cycle:
1. Are students achieving the intended competencies by the end of the clerkship?
2. Is assessment consistent across community sites? We've noticed variability in clinical-evaluation scores and aren't sure if it reflects real differences in students or in how sites/raters evaluate.
3. Is the student experience equitable across sites?
4. Where can we strengthen the assessment system overall?
You don't need this much detail — even a few plain-language paragraphs is enough to start.
Questions? Email contact@evalsmart.io. Your program details are used only to prepare your evaluation plan.